If you know this guy consider yourself a movie aficionado ..
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
CGI evolution, my geekly rant
This is the current evolution of CGI effects.
It's a bad evolution.
Dino 1: It started with an obvious toy
(- Arrgh!! - Gulp gulp gulp!)
The 1900s dinos did not fool anyone but let's face
it: special effects were not that sophisticated then.
And they had the feeling.
Dino 2: The Jurassic Park Monster
(- MRrr ... )
the Real thing. No biggie. It was *hit scary.
(ps. this is a pic of T-Rex toy and even
this is scary)
Dino 3: - Groan! Slurps! Squeak!
Computer, ugly, unrealistic, fake. What just happened?
R.I.P. realistic monsters.
It's a bad evolution.
Dino 1: It started with an obvious toy
(- Arrgh!! - Gulp gulp gulp!)
The 1900s dinos did not fool anyone but let's face
it: special effects were not that sophisticated then.
And they had the feeling.
Dino 2: The Jurassic Park Monster
(- MRrr ... )
the Real thing. No biggie. It was *hit scary.
(ps. this is a pic of T-Rex toy and even
this is scary)
Dino 3: - Groan! Slurps! Squeak!
Computer, ugly, unrealistic, fake. What just happened?
R.I.P. realistic monsters.
Our guide trough space and vice
I came across these images while desperately trying to search
a decent pic of PMT for the 1980s blog. TV Guide is truly
an interesting magazine. Here's the lot:
It seems to be that the pen is
more likely slipping
They invented Lost.
The 80ies. Maybe we ought not
to blame our parents.
the face and the nipples?
a decent pic of PMT for the 1980s blog. TV Guide is truly
an interesting magazine. Here's the lot:
It seems to be that the pen is
more likely slipping
They invented Lost.
The 80ies. Maybe we ought not
to blame our parents.
the face and the nipples?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)